How to read the Financial Times for free on the Internet

  • How can I read the Financial Times for free on the Internet?

    You can read financial times paywall based articles for free with this simple trick of installing a chrome extension in your browser from GitHub which is named “Paywall Chrome Smasher” Paywall chrome smasher is one of the best solutions to get around any newspaper site Paywalls for free.

    When i was searching for the same solution, people were advocating different methods to get around newspaper paywalls like using websites to paste the paywall article link or using Incogintio window but I find this adding a simple paywall smasher chrome extension from GitHub and you are ready to read any newspaper based articles including Financial Times or The New York Times.

    This video shows the complete process: How To Read Financial Times Articles For Free honestly I search for every possible solution but this video is the best one for anyone who doesn’t have any technical background.

    I hope this helps.

    Just sign up for the free account a couple of times.

    You can’t read it cover to cover, but you get a number of articles a week to read and you get access to all the headlines and the market data and tools.

    Dailies and Weeklies

    In general, I prefer a weekly approach to news, especially a paper with a weekly publishing schedule like The Economist, and confine reading it to one day of the week, typically on a weekend. News outlets that publish on a daily schedule (or worse, hourly) have to publish something everyday, even if it’s not important, making it horribly inefficient to consume.

    At most, you may want to supplement The Economist’s weekly coverage with some daily coverage from something like NYT, FT, or WSJ (depending on your line of work and interests). Usually a certain columnist or section will sway your subscription decision.

    A weekly schedule is preferable also because you can easily supplement it with daily coverage using good aggregators such as:

    Techmeme [ https://www.quora.com/topic/Techmeme ] (for tech): http://www.techmeme.com/

    Mediagazer [ https://www.quora.com/topic/Mediagazer ] (for media): http://mediagazer.com/

    Memeorandum [ https://www.quora.com/topic/Memeorandum ] (for politics): http://www.memeorandum.com/

    Hacker News [ https://www.quora.com/topic/Hacker-News ] (for general Silicon Valley water-cooler talk): http://news.ycombinator.com/

    Google News [ https://www.quora.com/topic/Google-News ] (anything and everything): https://news.google.com/

    These aggregators let you mix-and-match and eliminate the problem of being subscribed to only one quality publication. If you’re time-pressed anyway, you won’t have time to thoroughly read articles. You’ll mostly be scanning headlines and only rarely dig down into an item of interest, sort of like scanning a ticker.

    For the true news minimalists, The Economist’s “Politics this week” and “Business this week” are short sections you can read in 5 minutes that will provide a nutshell description of what’s happened in the past week. You don’t even need to read the rest of the issue.

    Lastly, we saw in 2012 the emergence of daily briefing sites like Evening Edition [ http://evening-edition.com/ ] and The Brief [ http://thebrief.io/ ] that compress the news into 3-4 bite-sized paragraphs each evening. You could spend 5 minutes on these at night and catch up on everything else on Sunday.

    Other attempts to condense the news to only the most vital bits include a few ambitious mobile apps that might be worth checking out. Circa [ http://cir.ca/ ] is one such app. Yahoo’s new iOS app Yahoo News Digest [ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/yahoo-news-digest/id784982356?mt=8 ] is another. Also check out the New York Times app NYTNow [ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/nytnow/id798993249?mt=8 ] and The Economist’s The Economist Espresso [ https://itunes.apple.com/app/the-economist-espresso/id896628003 ].

    Over the years, I’ve experimented with various hacks to keep informed in the least amount of time possible. The nuggets of wisdom I’ve gained along the way are below.

    A few guiding principles go a long way

    WSJ, FT, NYT, and The Economist are all great publications, and restricting most of your news to one or two of these sources is a wise strategy. The rest of the news-sphere is too cluttered/noisy/expansive to be meaningfully mined.

    Most “news” is simply link-bait info-porn.

    A majority of headlines (particularly from blogs) are tailored to catch your attention, even if the content is of little importance. It’s information for information’s sake. In other words, you could do without it. Learn to just grasp a headline and maybe a few lines down if you absolutely have to. (especially if you’re cruising an aggregator). This is what most of today’s blogs and news sites are in the business of selling. It’s trivial and time-inefficient.

    Certain philosophies about “catching up with the news” may be destructive. As already discussed, completely abandon any notions about having to “catch up with the news.” There’s just too much for it all to be in some way relevant to you, so zero in on the articles that will add to your knowledge about something you are personally invested in. There is a minimal amount every citizen of a democracy should know in order to participate. The rest however is about you.

    Podcasts (usually) aren’t efficient

    Podcasts can be useful because if they’re weekly, you get pre-aggregated, pre-filtered news; BUT they’re grossly inefficient because there’s too much extraneous commentary that just ends up wasting a bunch of your time; if you’re reading instead, you pick the pace and even choose what parts of an article to read; podcasts aren’t an ideal solution unless you’re in situations where you cannot read the news but can still listen to it (like your commute).

    Weekly digests may be promising

    If you have topics you like to keep up with but aren’t urgent, the weekly route may be the best. Of course, people have been doing this for over a century by just reading the Sunday edition of their paper, and that’s actually not a bad strategy. However, if you’re looking to implement this strategy with blogs, you’re going to see mixed results. Most blogs don’t have a good weekly digest, and if they do, it’s just a list of links to the week’s top stories, nothing really chewed up and rehashed for an end-of-the-week rundown. Fir an example see: What is the best weekly top tech news digest? [ https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-weekly-top-tech-news-digest ]

    Time-shifting is a double-edged sword

    Time-shifting read-it-later systems are a double-edged sword: they might help you catch up on some more news than you normally would be able to, but they only contribute to info-clutter. The ability to save articles is too easy to abuse and before you know it you’ll have saved hundreds or even thousands of pieces.

    I was a diehard Instapaper [ https://www.quora.com/topic/Instapaper ] user for two years, but I’ve stopped using it for a while now and couldn’t be happier. It wasn’t Instapaper itself: I have great respect for the product and developer. It was the whole concept of time-shifting my reading.

    I’ve switched to an in-the-moment philosophy of reading news. If I don’t have time to read something in the moment, I’ll just forget about it. The problem with these services is that you’re reading list grows into a bottomless pit. You even get a slow, creeping anxiety about how much of your reading list you haven’t gotten to. Why go…

    One tip: don’t subscribe to the print edition. Although the paper lands daily on my doorstep, I get three web articles per month. Insult to injury? They only allow something like five suspended issues per year.

    The upshot: great content hidden behind a paywall even subscribers can’t scale. Hope they embrace the new mellinnium before it is too late.

    This is no contest. The newspaper actually brings me enjoyment and knowledge. Try picking up a well-done print paper some time. Of course there’s The New York Times, but The New York Post is fun in its own way — and it really doesn’t translate to the web. Each issue every day is a work of art — written in the style of a 1920s noir detective novel — with great headlines and photoshops. All for just $1.25. It’s an amazing, under appreciated gem.

    Compare that to social media. Facebook is full of clickbait and dysfunctional relatives whining about aches and pains and the Democrats or Republicans. Twitter is yawn. Instagram has no soul — just random pictures.

    The newspaper is actually curated. Nothing random. But, still, it’s full of surprises.

    If you want to bypass Financial times articles then the best way to use an extension called “Bypass Paywall Chrome extension”

    Using this extension is very simple, you just have to download the extension from GitHub and install it on your Chrome or add it to your chrome extension and Boom. You can read hundreds of other credible sources by reading articles in Financial times.

    As they say “Democracy dies in darkness”, the same thing happened “News dies in Paywall”

    If you want to get around almost any newspaper paywall, install the Bypass chrome paywall extension. It is free to use.

    This video shows the complete process: How To Read Financial Times Articles For Free honestly I search for every possible solution but this video is the best one for anyone who doesn’t have any technical background.

    Let me lead with this: Not all publications are equal, paid or otherwise. You can pay for subscriptions to some pretty bad newspapers, magazines, and journals. Free sources are the same in that the reliability and analysis vary greatly.

    Now, my subscriptions include(d) the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, Rotman Magazine and a few other monthly/weekly publications. Whether or not it’s worth it to you will depend greatly on what your looking to get out of them.

    Reports vs. Analysis

    Yahoo News and Business Insider will break a lot of great stories and keep you up to date on whats happening in the business world. The Wall Street Journal on the other hand will go into the ‘why’ aspect of news with greater depth, offering up – mostly – unbiased analysis of the news.

    Buzz Worthy vs. Insightful

    The majority of free publications (Forbes, Business Insider, etc.) will give you a lot of petty/trivial junk, like the ‘
    6 Body Language Mistakes You Don’t Know You’re Making‘ crap (actual article). On the other hand, Rotman Management Magazine (a relatively pricey quarterly publication) gives you really thoughtful, actionable, and thought provoking articles. Don’t get me wrong. Body language is important, but these ‘articles’ are nothing more than recycled BuzzFeed lists.

    Is Advertising An Issue?

    I absolutely refuse to subscribe to, or frequent any publication that makes advertising an obtrusive and annoying experience. Think of magazines with a 2 to 1 ratio of advertising vs. content. To me it’s infuriating. Others live with it, and some use AdBlock plugins in their browsers (i don’t like the idea of AdBlock because some businesses deserve/need it and don’t abuse readers/visitors with advertising). A lot of the high quality publications will take it easy on advertising, as their goal is to make money on subscriptions instead.

    There’s more to it but, to me, the insight and quality in paid publications is simply better (usually).

    It depends on where you live. In most European countries, your local news-stand would be your best bet. When I was living in Austria, I’d usually head to the nearest ‘Tabak’ though again it depends on what district you live in. Usually, its easier to find newsstands selling the FT closer to the city centre.

    In certain other countries, you just need to subscribe and they ship it to you. In India, for example, the Financial Times is shipped from Singapore/Hong Kong everyday as India has rules restricting 100% ownership in local news media.

    In case you want to read the FT, your best bet is opening an account on FT.com. Its easier than subscribing to the print edition because in some countries the copy doesn’t come in until mid-morning and is also more affordable.

    In case you need to buy the print edition, another rough rule of thumb would be any newsstand that sells The Economist will also stock the FT (The Economist is also 50% owned by the Financial Times Group).

    Media Bias Fact Check gives it a High Factual and Least Biased rating. I’d feel comfortable with it as a source.

    Detailed Report

    Factual Reporting: HIGH

    Country: United Kingdom

    World Press Freedom Rank: UK 33/180

    History

    Founded in 1888, The Financial Times (FT) is an English-language international broadsheet daily newspaper with a special emphasis on business and economic news. The paper originates from London, UK. The current editor is Lionel Barber.

    According to the Global Capital Markets Survey, which measures readership habits amongst most senior financial decision makers in the world’s largest financial institutions, the Financial Times is considered the most important business read, reaching 36% of the sample population, 11% more than The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), its main rival.

    Funded by / Ownership

    The Financial Times is owned by The Nikkei, which is a Japanese news and financial information company that publishes the leading financial paper The Nikkei. The FT generates revenue through subscriptions, a hard paywall and advertising.

    Analysis / Bias

    In review, the Financial Times primarily reports economic news with minimally biased tone such as this: Trump calls on China to drop levies on US farm products. This story, like all others on the website are properly sourced. Editorially, the Financial Times sticks to economics and how politics impacts it. There is again, minimal bias in reporting. In general, FT reports straight news with minimal bias and proper sourcing.

    A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check.

    Overall, we rate the Financial Times Least Biased based on balanced reporting and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check. (12/11/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 3/2/2019)

    Source: Financial Times


    Financial Times – Media Bias/Fact Check

    Hey

    It’s always hard to get higher in leagues but I will give you my 5 top ways to get to crystal or higher. Remember I’m talking about TH8, TH9 and also it can vary in troop lvl. I wish you the best trying these tips and tricks. Here’s my top 10 tricks and tips for grinding up trophies.

    1. Use The Quick Train To Your Advantage = Train up 2 army’s at once so when you battle you can be ready to keep on battling.
    2. Choosing An Easy Base = Look for someone that has a farm base or low defensive lvl for your army’s.
    3. People Can’t Attack You = Try to keep your device from turning on.
    4. Shields = Don’t attack during when you have a shield. If you going away just buy a shield that can last you how long your gone for (Im not telling you to spend any money on this game) Also save your gems it will help.
    5. Builders = Try to save your gems and get 5 builders before TH8, TH9, TH10 and TH11.
    6. Loot = Get as much loot as you can so then you can upgrade everything and make it harder for the attacker to attack your base.
    7. Maxing Out = Try to max out your TH so then again it will make it harder for your opponent to 3 star you.
    8. Clan = Make sure your clan is always helping and giving you as many troops and spells. Also make sure your clan mates are friendly and kind to you.
    9. Upgrading Troops = Upgrade the troops that you use more than the ones that you hardly use.
    10. Watch And Ask = Share you defence when your opponent 2 stared or 3 stared you and ask for any advice from you clan mates.

    If we hit over 50 up votes I will give more advice on keeping and moving higher trophies.

    See You Seen And Remember Stay Juicie Like A Watermelon

    Short answer: there aren’t.

    The Guardian is free to read online.

    And as many major newspapers, its print edition is also essentially free: 90% of the price of making The Guardian is paid through advertising, the cover price being a tiny contribution.

    When a newspaper SAYS its 100% free that means it will charge no cover price but rely more heavily on advertisement or other streams of income. Almost all of those streams of income can and will compromise the quality and independence of a newspaper. So unless you find a newspaper 100% funded by small donations of other readers, and given for free to everyone, it won’t even stand a chance of being a high quality product.

    Even in that hypothetical case, given all budget you can manage and all favourable odds, rising to the consistent quality of an outlet like The Guardian is difficult. That’s why some of these brands are huge. It’s not like you can replicate it easily and much less for free.

    Quality journalism is expensive to produce. Bright side: nobody is forcing you to pay. Your choice.

    High quality global journalism requires investment. Please subscribe. FT offers significant discounts for students and corporate clients.

    Yes, very much worth.

    While I don’t know where you live and what newspaper you subscribe to and other demographics, I think your question itself defines the contours of your society. If most of the local page is filled with crime news, then I think there is something wrong with the society. Every crime deserves to be reported but it also depends on the news values and treatment of your newspaper. Same is with sports, maybe majority of the population follows a particular sport. One thing you can do is to write to the Editor about your concerns. If it is a good newspaper, the Editor should respond. As citizens, we are stakeholders in a newspaper.

    I think you are a serious reader. If yes, then I am sure you will like the Edit and Op-Ed pages, which usually present diversepoints and analyses. Magazines definitely present better stories (i.e. features) because they have more time to work on each event/issue/edition. But you cannot buy a magazine everyday. Also, newspapers survive on advertising. There should be atleast one newspaper that has a healthy mix of advertisements and editorial content. If you ask me, read that newspaper which is not part of a larger business conglomerate.

    Finally, we read newspapers because we want to know what’s happening in the society/world around us, because it impacts us directly or indirectly. If you personalize your news, then you are restricting your exposure to the world. That way you will endup reading to gratify your wants, which is perhaps not healthy. One thing we must not forget is that newspapers reflect our society, not the tastes and preferences of its readers.

    I am more partial to the Financial Times; as it in my opinion provides a broader world than the The Wall Street Journal. Both deliver first-rate company news; neither skews news to anything that would seem reprehensible to a free trader. I would say that the FT will yield a non-European a better understanding of Europe than the WSJ and vice versa, the WSJ will provide a non-American a better understanding of (North) America.

    The weekend edition for the FT is without reservation superior to the WSJ’s execution; for one it is not Friday’s paper, and the fortnightly glossy How to Spend It magazine is sexy, which is a stretch for stolid financial press.

    So short of the weekend, no overriding preference, my only suggestion is: stick to the same paper every day, and you will get a better feel for their editorial policy, writers’ slants … so when something is off you will know it.

    Lastly, quoting the FT seems to suggest a more credible source to most (almost akin to peer reviewed) than quoting the WSJ.

Buy CBD Oil Pennsylvania